(vague and ambiguous) Jim on craigslist's current revenue

MORE: in any case, unless giving 1% of revenues to charity (aka the Craigslist Foundation) can also not be relied upon... estimating craigslist's total revenues (by multiplying by 100) sould be a pretty accurate method... D.
.........

Jim, in an email to Andrew Clark of the Guardian: "We couldn't in good conscience recommend relying upon the figures you have mentioned (or any other publicly available figures for that matter) for the purpose of accurately estimating revenue" (15th paragraph)

notice Jim just muddles up the issue (he gives no clue in what direction the estimates are off or what is the scale of the error...)

Delia

Guardian re:Craig: "Could there be a hint of disingenuity here?" you *think*?*lol*

re: "when a multi-millionaire entrepreneur professes to care little about money, it tends to ring alarm bells of scepticism" (first paragraph) -- it was about time! (it's ONLY taken about a decade...)

Delia